An infant is just as dependent on another person as an unborn *****. Do we have the right to kill them too? Or the elderly who are dependent, or the handicapped? Where do we draw the line?

Question

This is how SICK the pro-choice mind set is.

Answer 1

Murder Inc. didn't kill nearly as many defenseless and innocent people

Answer 2

I block people that become total a-*****. Congratulation James!

Answer 3

No there is not a difference. The people above are just as dependent as an unborn ***** and the unborn ***** is completely genetically human.

Answer 4

Actually they're not and you do know this. At the time 99.9% abortions occur when a fetus can not live outside of it's human host. What next? Determining that cloned humans have a right to be called "persons"?

Answer 5

Are you serious? An infant cannot live without ********** either, are they not humans? BTW there are no cloned humans, that is illegal. And if there were wouldn't they be human? Are not identical twins humans, they are essentially clones.

Answer 6

I'm done arguing. I think I voiced my opinion very clearly.

Answer 7

Your incorrect opinion is noted.

Answer 8

Boy, that poster took you to the woodshed too. This isn't your day is it?............................. gets upset and BLOCKS people whenever she loses a debate !!!

Answer 9

Keep dreaming!

Answer 10

.

Answer 11

That is totally untrue! I have no problem with the WIC program and other programs designed to aid ******** in need. I donate to charities in the US and around the world to ****** ******** get food, shelter and an education. I have a real problem with LAME parents who murder their ******** before they are born and fail to provide love, care and security for their ******** after they are born! I believe that ALL life should be cherished. So, YOU can SAVE IT!

Answer 12

Are you really that stupid?
http://www.ncsl.org/research/...

Answer 13

.

Answer 14

Oh boy, you just opened up a can of old fashioned Alabama whoop ***! You're in for it!

They think life begins at ********!

Answer 15

Next it will cloned humans, etc.

Answer 16

That is illegal dummy! What do you have against identical twins anyway?

Answer 17

Who ever said life began at ********?

Answer 18

Answer 19

Geez, there's a difference between a living, breathing human being and a zygote that hasn't developed into a living human.

Answer 20

Well the fetal obsession you feel quickly changes as soon as the ***** comes through the womb. Then it's about not wanting your tax dollars going to help care for that little welfare kid. Save it.

Answer 21

No one has the right to force any woman to birth a ***** she doesn't want.

Answer 22

I think most people against abortion are pretty closed-minded about the situation entirely. You care more about women not aborting than the safety and if the mother can properly care for it after it is born.

Let's say a woman does give birth because most of society is shaming abortion. That woman basically gives up everything to provide proper care for this infant and **** up resenting them. The ***** then grows up thinking/knowing that their mother blames them for 'ruining her life' I guess. This person might believe that no one could ever love them and becomes suicidal, or abusive and obsessive in future relationships.

Answer 23

No one has the right to force an unborn person to die simply because they exist.

Answer 24

I see exactly what you mean with the arguments on this board!

Answer 25

Do you eat eggs?

Answer 26

First, yes I eat CHICKEN eggs. Second, the eggs you get at the store are not fertilized. Third, a chicken is not a human.

Answer 27

Exactly!!!! That was exactly my thought too!

Answer 28

Because it's from a chicken that makes it less important/not equivalent.

Answer 29

Well, at least you acknowledge that it is a "*****" being murdered by its own mother, not a piece of unwanted, non-human tissue that means nothing. *****!

Answer 30

There is this thing called adoption. People are going overseas to adopt because they cannot adopt an American *****.

Answer 31

LOL, it about the rights of the unborn!

Answer 32

Straw men do not a case for murder make. To take the life of pre or post-birthed infants/******** can only be called what it is - murder. Try to justify it by its correct term. It is a cold, callous, desensitized, selfish heart that supports such murder of the weakest and helpless among us. M. Sanger and A. Hitler seem to have won the day. SMH.

Answer 33

I dont call it pro-choice

I call it pro-murder, pro-genocide and the people who support taking a precious life is no better than hitler

Answer 34

I totally agree

Answer 35

I agree Onyx~~

Answer 36

Thank you :)

Answer 37

Excellent question. We have granted ourselves permission to eliminate the weakest, most dependent among us. I say "permission" because we have no "right" to take the lives of pre or post-birthed ********, the infirm, brain-damaged, aged, etc. We have accepted and baptized murder as a morally defensible act when, in fact, there is nothing about it that is defensible or moral. What it is, IMO, is simply justification to not be inconvenienced by anyone or anything that does not provide for our immediate gratification and ease ... selfishness at the cost of another's life.

Ah, but I go on ....

Answer 38

Very well said. Thank you :)

Answer 39

You draw the line at legislating your beliefs to other women.

Answer 40

These people are nuts. I had to block which I rarely do.