Question

Are you against a woman as President?

Answer 1

Just not this one.

Answer 2

In Finland, our president is a woman.

Answer 3

Good point!

Answer 4

Bernie Sanders & Elizabeth Warren would be an excellent pair.

Answer 5

In this coming 2016 election I'am against a women. I vote by who closely matches the beliefs and writings of the founding fathers and the ideals they put forth in creating this once great country

Answer 6

yet the office should not be decided by gender; look how well we have done when race was the deciding factor; competence next time please.

Answer 7

Wymens should be in the kitchen tending the rabbits

Answer 8

This Lady would have been a better candidate than her husband.

Answer 9

But that would never be my reason for voting for them.

Answer 10

Is she President because she's qualified and doing a good job or because she's a woman?

Answer 11

The world should be full of them! Less war!!!!

Answer 12

Both

Answer 13

Heck no I'm not against it. I DO NOT want Hillary Clinton to be President, though.

Answer 14

Either way it will be buisness as usual.

Answer 15

gender is irrelevant in my ********** of candidates

Answer 16

Very pro-female for President

Answer 17

Does that mean you use gender as the deciding factor?

Answer 18

It means what it means. I don't care if it's a male or female President.

Answer 19

No!

Answer 20

Unless they synced up - then we'd have a war every month.

Answer 21

...have you seen the crop of low-life scumbags we've had for presidents, starting with Nixon??...How could a woman POSSIBLY do worse ???...

Answer 22

As long as they do better then the last two presidents

Answer 23

I am against an America hating president that will not follow the constitution and behaves like a dictator wanna be.

Answer 24

She certainly couldn't mess it up any worse than a man .... (one in particular, and it isn't the current one!)

Answer 25

I'm against the media distracting the population with this irrelevant factoid.

Answer 26

I am against a woman who runs on the platform that she's a woman. That's ******.

We tried ****** racism by electing a guy who got elected because he was a minority and ignored most of his political preferences. That hasn't worked too well for the world.

We need to elect a person solely because of their qualifications for that position. When we do, racism and bigotry will solve itself.

Answer 27

If the woman is capable. I've yet to see any female "hopeful" impressive to me and the males don't exactly jump out at me as being that great anymore, either!

[Not up for debate]

Not into political discussions.

Answer 28

But I am against Hillary as president.

Answer 29

I wouldn't mind it at all and it would be nice to see a female President for a change.
Gender has nothing to do with it. If a woman is competent as a leader then she should have the same opportunity as a man does.

Answer 30

Nope...as long as the election is predicated on her ability to effectively lead the US, and not solely on the basis of gender...

Answer 31

Many othER nations have amazing female leaders. It's time the USA catches on to this and other modern trends.

Answer 32

It depends on the woman. I voted for Jill Stein in 2012, and I may vote for her again in 2016, but I won't back Hillary

Answer 33

Trends don't matter, people do.

Answer 34

Women no. Hillary yes.

Answer 35

Margaret Thatcher was a genuine leader.

Expecting special treatment and consideration due to ****** anatomy is, however, not 'Leadership'.

Answer 36

no. as long as they have the same **** values as I do, i'll vote for them

Answer 37

Nor am I against this one. Looking forward to another 8 years of a Clinton run country.

Answer 38

A woman could make a grand president.

Answer 39

I think it's time for women to have a go at it. Men have done what they could.

Answer 40

Not at all. We have had enough men ruin things for quite some time, I am always open for change. (No debate I don't care about your personal political horse manure)

Answer 41

If the woman is qualified