0 votes
in Living by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

38 Answers

0 votes
by
What inappropriate posts? Is "gene" back again?
0 votes
by
How about we let their parents do the policing.
0 votes
by
Excuse me? I'm pretty sure me and every other teen on here aren't offended by these posts. We have more inappropriate conversations with each other than what I see on here..
0 votes
by
I have no problem with that.

What are we going to deem inappropriate for these kiddies?
0 votes
by
No. The term Minor needs to be eliminated. *** says work no ill for a good reason. Mans laws are made to entrap people to do ill to people.They are young people.*** does not hide any of what he made from our eyes no matter what the age.
0 votes
by
Stop the infernal banning! *** is not happy when people make people think that *** what *** made deserves a negative name.
0 votes
by
The devil wants the Adam and Eve innocents of ******** to be forbidden too see what *** made making *** evil in their minds to subconsciously dislike what *** made. Let all ages into furry conventions even as ******** are allowed to walk about in ***** nature and walk around zoo seeing animals that are ***** too. Let them see the ****** organs real or fake. They are made by ***. People need to stop making our young ones think *** is somehow evil for making them.
0 votes
by
People seeing any part of the body as inappropriate sees the entire body as inappropriate. Satan thinks banned. People need to have Jesus in them to see Jesus in another. Jesus would not look at Jesus saying I ban this or that. Not doing what Jesus would do is swearing taking his name in vain. Art should not be divided anywhere. Satan is the one who divides. I want furry conventions to be allowed to show all art together. Furries should be allowed to make their furry suits to look exactly the way they want them in every detail even as *** made life to show every detail. There should be zero rejection of any part. Reject any part reject the whole body.
0 votes
by
You are not responsible for what you do to the one who made all? Your words are not perverted? How so. All things people did not make are not ****?
0 votes
by
Just what we need. More censorship. NOT! It's the parents job to teach the kids. Not someones job to take away someones freedom of speech so they don't offend. Your forgetting how good the PC crap is going.
0 votes
by
Loved most of your post but I have a **** time raving your 4 letter explicative. ;-)
0 votes
by
you have a point here ..
there's some things that are just completely INAPPROPRIATE for minors ..
(and since the site allows minors as young as 13 (and I know there's those younger than that .. who have LIED about their age too) these things are just troubling .. )

(plus, even as an ***** .. there's some things that are just best left PERSONAL and private .. not out there in such an obvious way .. )
0 votes
by
Who's to judge what is inappropriate and what is not? Kids hear worse on the television and the radio.
0 votes
by
Yes you are right and we need to stand up and stop giving money to those who put out such trash.

Jerry Rubin was NOT right.
0 votes
by
im not sure about this...
0 votes
by
I think we should raise the ******** age limit to 21.
0 votes
by
I'd rather ban the minors.
0 votes
by
really meme
0 votes
by
"They start them on **** in grade school".............What kind of school are you sending your kids too?
0 votes
by
I think you need to read this before you post questions like this.
Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to ********, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
0 votes
by
I sure do agree. It is not often that I see somethind inappropriate but it does happen.
0 votes
by
Love the grammar.
"on"
"controlled"
0 votes
by
American english is not her first language.
0 votes
by
I'm inappropriate; you're inappropriate; we're ALL inappropriate.
(think of Al Pacino while you read that.)
0 votes
by
Disagree, do an age verification if you want but not censorship.
0 votes
by
Inappropriate is subjective, not objective.
0 votes
by
BS!
0 votes
by
What? You're delusional. Oh I see, there's minors so censorship its a must now.

Minors should be studying, doing homework, playing sports, riding bicycles, etc. not engaging in grown ups conversations or things they know nothing about. If they do, they must be mature enough to not find it boring thus not being offended or disturbed by "inappropriate posts"
0 votes
by
Inappropriate posts? I haven't seen anything inappropriate. I must be looking in the wrong places.
0 votes
by
Listen the perversion they are being taught today in school is way worse than anything on here! Kids in school today would be **** to shock! They start them on **** in grade school after all! I have no problem here but I'm sure the crap they do at school I would never sit through! Perversion holds no interest for me!
0 votes
by
Huh?
0 votes
by
This is a very tame site IMO. I have never seen anything "inappropriate " here. Teens today know so much more about edgy topics than we did at their ages. I am sure they are not shocked by anything they read. And who is going to edit the posts? The posters ' police ? Let 's leave these issues to the parents and get on with our lives.
0 votes
by
Be a parent. Monitor your kids while they are on the internet.
0 votes
by
Agree
0 votes
by
I think parents need to monitor what their ******** are viewing online. Don't ****** that the internet will babysit your ******** or that the ****** online will always be on the up and up.
0 votes
by
What are minors doing on this site in the first place...I always thought you had to supply your D.O.B etc...so IF there are minors on here it's ********* fault and problem...not mine or anyone elses
0 votes
by
What our teen members need to understand here is that this isn't about if they're bothered. It about whether it's appropriate and/or legal for ****** to converse directly to minors in ways that cross the line; like ********. I think there are times here when the cyberworld makes it difficult to remember that some of our members are younger than our own ********.
But at the same time, not everyone here is honest about their age. So caution all of the time is a good policy.
0 votes
by
Should I give up my privilege to participate in an open forum because some ****** allow their minor ******** access to the site. Unequivocally NO!!! If minors are allowed to visit the site, then it is not the responsibility of the ** administration to censor the material, it is the responsibility of the ****** to supervise the minors. A daunting task on the WWW and on a open forum.
...